|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
Twelve good neighbours: the citizen as a juror | Author(s) | Anna Coote, Deborah Mattinson |
Publisher | Fabian Society, London, 1997 |
Pages | 15 pp (Local government policy discussion paper 31) |
Source | The Fabian Society, 11 Dartmouth Street, London SW1H 9BN. |
Keywords | Health services ; Consumer ; Participation ; United Kingdom. |
Annotation | The citizens' jury has emerged as a new form of public involvement in health care decision-making in the United Kingdom (UK). In 1996, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and Opinion Leader Research conducted a pilot series of five citizens' juries, four in collaboration with selected health authorities. This discussion paper outlines the characteristics of citizens' juries and presents four case histories of questions considered by the juries of the different health authorities: health care rationing (Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Commission); priorities in palliative care (Walsall Health Authority); the standard of mental health care provision (Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster Health Authority); and drugs and community safety (Lewisham Council). The paper concludes with a section on the most common questions raised by citizens' juries. (AKM). |
Accession Number | CPA-990223401 P |
Classmark | L: WY: TMB: 8 |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|