Centre for Policy on Ageing
 

 

Outpatient geriatric evaluation and management: is there an investment effect?
Author(s)Ronald W Toseland, John C O'Donnell, Joseph B Engelhardt
Journal titleThe Gerontologist, vol 37, no 3, June 1997
Pagespp 324-332
KeywordsNeeds [elderly] ; Health services ; Screening ; Evaluation ; Out-patients ; Costs [care] ; United States of America.
AnnotationGeriatric evaluation and management (GEM) includes comprehensive assessment and continuing care by a team of health care professionals, and has been suggested as one way of controlling costs while delivering high quality health care to frail older people. In this US study, the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient GEM was compared to usual outpatient primary care (UPC). Although GEM had no overall impact on health care use or cost of care for the entire study period, significant reductions were found during the 16-24 month study period, suggesting a possible investment effect. In the first 8 months of the study, GEM patients incurred 34.8% more in health care costs than UPC patients, but in the final eight months of the study the cost of care for UPC patients exceeded that for GEM patients by 37.8%. (AKM).
Accession NumberCPA-980812404 A
ClassmarkIK: L: 3V: 4C: LFB: QDC: 7T

Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing

...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing.
 

CPA home >> Ageinfo Database >> Queries to: webmaster@cpa.org.uk