|
| |
|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
Self-report versus state records for identifying crashes among older drivers | Author(s) | Richard A Marottoli, Leo M Cooney Jr, Mary E Tinetti |
Journal title | The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological sciences and medical sciences, vol 52A, no 3, May 1997 |
Pages | pp M184-M187 |
Keywords | Drivers accidents ; Driving capability ; United States of America. |
Annotation | There is growing concern about the potential safety implications of the increasing number of older drivers among public health and safety officials. A primary consideration in determining the risk is the method of outcome ascertainment. In the case of car crashes, the two most common methods are self-report and state record of events. In this study, the self-reports of car crashes were compared to state records among 358 active drivers in a sample of community-living individuals aged 72 years and older in New Haven, Connecticut, in 1989. Results showed that of the 358 drivers, 33 had reported or had a state record of a crash in the previous year. Of the 33, 20 were identified by self-report only, 9 by both self-report and state records, and 4 by state records only. The study concluded that self-report and state records provide complementary information for the ascertainment of crashes among older drivers. |
Accession Number | CPA-971125213 A |
Classmark | OPD: OPF: 7T |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|
|