|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
What do we know about patient targeting in geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) programs? | Author(s) | D Wieland, L Z Rubenstein |
Journal title | Aging: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol 8, no 5, October 1996 |
Pages | pp 297-310 |
Keywords | Health services ; Screening ; Evaluation ; United States of America. |
Annotation | Evidence indicates that institution-based programmes for interdisciplinary geriatric evaluation and management (GEMs) improve outcomes of care, but results vary considerably between studies. Targeting (i.e. selective admission of frail elderly patient subgroups who are thought particularly to benefit) has been advocated for improving the cost-effectiveness of GEM programmes; results from meta-analysis give this concept some support. This review describes approaches to GEM targeting and development of selection criteria; assesses evidence from randomised trials concerning the effects of targeting on outcome; and suggests an agenda for further research on GEM targeting. |
Accession Number | CPA-970327029 A |
Classmark | L: 3V: 4C: 7T |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|