| |
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
When finance captures labor's capital
— dominant personal pensions, resurgent occupational provision in Central and Eastern Europe | | Author(s) | Marek Naczcyk |
| Journal title | Social Policy and Administration, vol 52, no 2, March 2018 |
| Publisher | Wiley, March 2018 |
| Pages | pp 549-562 |
| Source | http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/spol |
| Keywords | Private pensions ; Eastern Europe ; Poland. |
| Annotation | Whereas in Western Europe occupational plans dominate private pension provision, coverage of such plans is marginal in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Previous literature has shown the World Bank's instrumental role in persuading CEE countries to divert part of their social security contributions towards mandatory personal pensions. The dominance of the Bank's model of pension privatisation from the mid-1990s largely explains the marginalisation of occupational plans. However, as this model has been challenged since the late 2000s, occupational pensions (OPs) have re-appeared on the agenda. To shed light on the changing politics of OPs, this article focuses on the role of organised interests - namely employers' associations, trade unions and financial groups - that are key players in Western Europe, but whose role has been insufficiently studied in CEE. The article follows these actors' activities in the last three decades of pension politics in Poland, i.e., one of the few CEE countries to have promoted occupational provision. It shows that, although organised interests had limited policy expertise and mainly mobilised social consent for - or opposition to - reform in the early phases of post-communist pension reform, the growing organisational resources of business groups - in contrast with unions - make them increasingly influential actors in reshaping the contours of CEE private pension provision. (RH). |
| Accession Number | CPA-180309211 A |
| Classmark | JK: 7A: 7AE |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
| ...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|