| |
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
Safeguarding practice in England where access to an adult at risk is obstructed by a third party
— findings from a survey | | Author(s) | Jill Manthorpe, Martin Stevens, Stephen Martineau, Caroline Norrie |
| Journal title | Journal of Adult Protection, vol 19, no 6, 2017 |
| Publisher | Emerald, 2017 |
| Pages | pp 323-332 |
| Source | http://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/jap |
| Keywords | Protection [vulnerable adults] ; Elder abuse ; At risk ; Rights [elderly] ; Law ; England. |
| Annotation | Being able to speak in private to an adult about whom there is a safeguarding concern is central to English local authorities' duty under the Care Act 2014. While there has been an ongoing debate about whether social workers or others should have new powers to effect such enquiries, it has been unclear how common obstructive behaviour by third parties is and how often this causes serious problems or is unresolved. The purpose of this paper was to address this knowledge gap. A survey of local authority adult safeguarding managers was conducted in 2016 and interviews were undertaken with managers and social workers in three local authorities. Data were analysed descriptively. Estimates of numbers and frequency of cases of obstruction varied widely. Most survey respondents and interview participants described situations where there had been some problems in accessing an adult at risk. Those that were serious and longstanding problems of access were few in number, but were time consuming and often distressing for the professionals involved. Further survey research on the prevalence of obstructive behaviour of third parties may not command greater response rates unless there is a specific policy proposal or a case that has `hit the headlines'. Other forms of data collection and reporting may be worth considering. Interview data likewise potentially suffer from problems of recall and definition. At times professionals will hear of, or encounter, difficulties in accessing an adult at risk about whom there is concern. Support from supervisors and managers is needed by practitioners as such cases can be distressing. Localities may wish to collect and reflect upon such cases so that there is learning from practice about possible resolution and outcomes. There is no evidence of large numbers of cases where access is denied or very difficult. Those cases where there are problems are memorable to practitioners. Small numbers of cases, however, do not necessarily mean that the problem of gaining access is insignificant. (JL). |
| Accession Number | CPA-180119203 A |
| Classmark | CA3G: QNT: CA3: IKR: VR: 82 |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
| ...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|