|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
Perceived value of support for older adults coping with multi-morbidity patient, informal care-giver and family physician perspectives | Author(s) | Gayathri Naganathan, Kerry Kuluski, Ashlinder Gill |
Journal title | Ageing and Society, vol 36, no 9, October 2016 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press, October 2016 |
Pages | pp 1891-1914 |
Source | journals.cambridge.org/aso |
Keywords | Chronic illness ; Ill health ; Services ; Health services ; Attitude ; Patients ; Informal care ; General practitioners ; Qualitative Studies ; Canada. |
Annotation | The perceived value of informal and formal supports for older adults with multi-morbidity was investigated from the perspectives of patients, care-givers and family physicians. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients, their informal care-givers and their family physicians in an urban academic family health team in Ontario, Canada. Analysis was conducted using a General Inductive Approach to facilitate identification of main themes and to build a framework of perceived value of supports. Participant views converged on supports that facilitate patient independence and ease care-giver burden. However, important differences in participant perceptions arose regarding these priorities. Physicians and care-givers valued supports that facilitate health and safety, while patients prioritised supports that enable self-efficacy and independence. While formal supports which eased care-giver burden were viewed positively by all members of the triad, many patients also rejected formal supports, citing that informal support from their care-giver was available. Such conflicts between patient, care-giver and physician-perceived value of supports may have important implications for consumer and care-giver willingness to accept formal supports when supports are available. These findings contribute to the broader literature on community-based care, by incorporating the perspectives of patients, informal care-givers and family physicians to understand better the barriers and facilitators of uptake of supportive services that contribute to successful ageing at home. (RH). |
Accession Number | CPA-161011006 A |
Classmark | CI: CH: I: L: DP: LF: P6: QT6: 3DP: 7S |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|