| |
| |
| |
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
Biology as destiny?
— Rethinking embodiment in 'deep' old age | | Author(s) | Susan Pickard |
| Journal title | Ageing and Society, vol 34, no 8, September 2014 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press, September 2014 |
| Pages | pp 1279-1291 |
| Source | journals.cambridge.org/aso |
| Keywords | Physical characteristics [elderly] ; Biological ageing ; Attitude ; Older women ; Women ; Sociology, Social Science. |
| Annotation | Despite sociological understanding that bodies are social and morphological, material and discursive, there is a persistent, prevailing tendency within sociology to approach the old body - particularly in 'deep old age' - as non-social. No longer amenable either to reflexive (consumerist) choice, or expressive of the self, it is viewed rather through a biomedical explanatory framework in which it is held to succumb to 'natural' physiological processes of decline that lie outside culture. This paper critically questions such assumptions which it links to sociology's acquiescing in modernity's age ideology rather than taking it as a starting point for critique. This means that sociology's sensitivity towards ageing is displayed, not in challenging models of the older body, but in diverting attention away from the body altogether and focusing on structural and cultural determinants which are not considered to encompass physiology. Arguing that biology and society do not exist on separate plains, and that the body in deep old age is, like other bodies, first and foremost a social body, the paper draws upon feminist methodology and epistemology for the purpose of dismantling such essentialism. It suggests that the sociological imagination will benefit from the eradication of age ideology through a clearer understanding not just of ageing but of embodiment at all stages of the lifecourse. |
| Accession Number | CPA-150604001 A |
| Classmark | BA: BH: DP: BD: SH: S |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
| ...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|
|