| |
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
Challenges, benefits and weaknesses of intermediate care
— results from five UK case study sites | | Author(s) | Emma Regen, Graham Martin, Jon Glasby |
| Journal title | Health and Social Care in the Community, vol 16, no 6, December 2008 |
| Pages | pp 629-637 |
| Source | http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/hsc |
| Keywords | Rehabilitation ; Aftercare ; Qualitative Studies ; Case studies ; England. |
| Annotation | The authors explore the views of practitioners and managers on the implementation of intermediate care for older people across England, including their perceptions of the challenges involved in its implementation and their assessment of the main benefits and weaknesses of provision. Qualitative data were collected in five case studies (English primary care trusts) via 51 semi-structured interviews and 21 focus group discussions during 2001 to 2004. Interviewees included senior managers, intermediate care service managers, clinicians and health and social care staff involved in the delivery of intermediate care. The data were analysed thematically using an approach based on the "framework" method. Workforce and funding shortages, poor joint working between health and social care agencies, and lack of support or involvement on the part of medical profession were identified as the main challenges to developing intermediate care. The perceived benefits of intermediate care for service users included flexibility, patient centredness and the promotion of independence. The "home-like" environment in which services were delivered was contrasted favourably with hospitals. Multidisciplinary team-working and opportunities for role flexibility were identified as key benefits for staff. Insufficient capacity, problems of access and awareness at the interface between intermediate care and "mainstream" services, combined with poor co-ordination between intermediate care services emerged as the main weaknesses in current provision. Despite reported benefits for service users and staff, the study indicates that intermediate care does not appear to be achieving its full potential for alleviating pressure within health and social care systems. The strengthening of capacity and workforce, improvements to whole systems working, and the promotion of intermediate care among doctors and other referrers were identified as key future priorities. (RH). |
| Accession Number | CPA-081126207 A |
| Classmark | LM: LN: 3DP: 69P: 82 |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
| ...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|