|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
The long-term consequences of partnership dissolution for support in later life in the United Kingdom | Author(s) | Karen Glaser, Rachel Stuchbury, Cecilia Tomassini |
Journal title | Ageing and Society, vol 28, part 3, April 2008 |
Pages | pp 329-352 |
Source | http://www.journals.cambridge.org/ASO |
Keywords | Divorce ; Family care ; Community care ; Domiciliary services ; Longitudinal surveys. |
Annotation | There has been an interest in the United Kingdom about whether and how changes in family life affect support for older people, but nevertheless the consequences of partnership dissolution for late-life support have been little researched. Using data from the British Household Panel Study (BHPS) for 1991-2003, this study investigated the longitudinal association between partnership dissolution and two types of support for 1966 people aged 70 or more years: informal support from children in the form of contacts and help; and formal support from community care services. The paper also examines the level of reported support among: all parents aged 70+; and 1453 unpartnered parents in the same age group (i.e those lacking the most important source of support in later life, a spouse). Diversity was found in the experience of partnership dissolution in the past lives of people aged 70+. Patterns of support varied by the respondent's age, whether partnered, the timing and type of partnership dissolution and by gender, having a daughter, and health status. Overall, partnership dissolution did not show the expected detrimental relationship with later-life support. Health needs and increasing age were strongly associated with increases in contact and informal and formal help, regardless of family history. (KJ/RH). |
Accession Number | CPA-080414202 A |
Classmark | SOH: P6:SJ: PA: N: 3J |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|