| |
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
Making the difference in social Europe
— deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states | | Author(s) | Wim van Oorschot |
| Journal title | Journal of European Social Policy, vol 16, no 1, February 2006 |
| Pages | pp 23-42 |
| Source | http://esp.sagepub.com |
| Keywords | Social welfare ; Public opinion ; Older people ; Physical disabilities ; Unemployment ; Immigrants ; Social surveys ; Europe. |
| Annotation | Welfare states treat different groups of needy people differently. Such differential rationing may reflect various considerations of policymakers, who act in economic, political and cultural contexts. This article aims to contribute to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the popular cultural context of welfare rationing. It examines European public perceptions of the relative deservingness of four needy group: older people, sick and disabled people, unemployed people, and immigrants. Hypotheses, deduced from a literature review, are tested against data from the 1999/2000 European Values Study survey. It is found that Europeans share a common and fundamental deservingness culture across countries and social categories. There is a consistent pattern that older people are seen as most deserving, closely followed by sick and disabled people. Unemployed people are seen as less deserving still, and immigrants as least deserving of all. Conditionality is greater in poorer countries, in countries with lower unemployment, and in countries where people have less trust in fellow citizens and in state institutions. At the national level, there is no relation with welfare regime type or welfare spending. Individual differences in conditionality are determined by several socio-demographic and attitudinal characteristics, as well as by certain features of the country people live in. (RH). |
| Accession Number | CPA-070109218 A |
| Classmark | TY: U5: B: BN: WH6: TJ: 3F: 74 |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
| ...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|