|
| |
|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
 | |
|
The battle for justice — [continuing care funding] | Author(s) | Richard Bartholomew |
Journal title | Professional Social Work, November 2006 |
Pages | pp 18-19 |
Source | http://www.basw.co.uk |
Keywords | National Health Service ; Health services ; Long term ; Finance [care] ; Law. |
Annotation | With the imminent publication of the Government's revised framework on continuing healthcare, the chair of a strategic health authority (SHA) appeals panel sets out why two court judgments should pave the way for much greater access to funding than potential new statutory guidance. Both rulings concern how continuing health care (CHC) eligibility criteria were incorrectly applied: the Coughlan judgment (R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex parte Pamela Coughlan) in the Court of Appeal in 1999; and the Grogan judgment (R v Bexley NHS Care Trust ex parte Grogan) in the High Court in 2006. (RH). |
Accession Number | CPA-061212205 A |
Classmark | L4: L: 4Q: QC: VR |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|
|