Centre for Policy on Ageing
 

 

Transition trade-offs: options for state pension reform
 — a discussion paper
Author(s)Chris Curry, Adam Steventon
Corporate AuthorPensions Policy Institute - PPI
PublisherPensions Policy Institute - PPI, London, May 2006
Pages65 pp
SourcePensions Policy Institute, King's College, 4th Floor, Waterloo Bridge Wing, Franklin Wilkins Building, Waterloo Road, London SE1 9NN. E-mail: info@pensionspolicyinstitute.org.uk Website link to item:
http://www.pensionspolicyinstitute.org.uk/news.asp...
KeywordsPensions ; Social policy.
AnnotationEight alternative state pension reform options that make different trade-offs to those made by the Pensions Commission are analysed in detail, and are evaluated against the Government's five tests for state pension reform. The alternatives discussed are first, earnings or price uprating: should pensions be increased in line with growth in average earnings, or increased line with the growth in prices (as is now the case)? Second, should entitlement be based on residency or on the existing National Insurance (NI) contributory pensions criteria? Third, one or two tiers: should the reformed system be based on a single pension, or the existing structure of the two-tier pension system? Fourth, slow or fast transition: should the final system be in place in the near future, or should it be allowed to evolve gradually over a long period of time? A final chapter examines the barriers the Pensions Commission perceived to a simpler solution. Appendices include quantitative analysis of the effect of different reform options using economic modelling; and a paper on the impact of setting a single-tier pension at a lower rate for individuals in couples. (RH).
Accession NumberCPA-060727001 B
ClassmarkJJ: TM2

Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing

...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing.
 

CPA home >> Ageinfo Database >> Last modified: Fri 21 Sep 2018, © CPA 2018 Queries to: webmaster@cpa.org.uk