Centre for Policy on Ageing
 

 

Deinstitutionalizing long-term care
 — making legal strides, avoiding policy errors
Author(s)Marshall B Kapp
Journal titleEthics, Law and Aging Review, vol 11, 2005
PublisherSpringer Publishing Company, New York, NY, 2005
Pages124 pp (whole issue)
SourceSpringer Publishing Company, Inc., 11 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036-8002. http://www.springerpub.com
KeywordsPsychogeriatric patients ; Discharge ; Community care ; Living in the community ; Social ethics ; Law ; United States of America.
AnnotationThe purpose of this volume is to bring together some original articles that examine the potential for changing long-term care, identify obstacles to change, and enlighten service providers, advocates and key policy makers in avoiding previous pitfalls in bringing about de-institutionalisation in the US. Two chapters include consideration of the 1999 decision, Olmstead v LC, which ruled it discriminatory to institutionalise a person who is disabled and wishes to live in the community and is capable from benefiting from such a setting. One of The chapters including this case discusses community-based alternatives to nursing homes for older people with serious mental illness. Other chapters look at rebalancing state long-term care systems; the use of prisons as long-term care facilities for people with psychiatric disabilities; and legal and ethical responsibility in worst-case situations when consumer-directed alternatives to nursing homes fail. Lastly, an independent article considers cross-cultural aspects of geriatric decision-making capacity. This volume of Ethics, Law and Aging Review is the last to be published. (RH).
Accession NumberCPA-060525201 B
ClassmarkLF:E: QKJ: PA: K4: TQ: VR: 7T

Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing

...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing.
 

CPA home >> Ageinfo Database >> Queries to: webmaster@cpa.org.uk