|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
Commentary [on article by Vernon L Greene : "Prospective budgeting for home care: making titration work"] | Author(s) | Robert A Applebaum |
Journal title | Journal of Aging and Health, vol 17, no 4, August 2005 |
Pages | pp 425-427 |
Source | http://www.sagepub.com |
Keywords | Domestic services [domiciliary] ; Case work ; Management [care] ; Grant allocation ; Cost benefit analysis ; Mathematical models ; United States of America. |
Annotation | Applebaum questions the assumptions made by Greene in his method of assessing home care finance (based on work by Weissert and colleagues), and he elaborates on two reasons. First, it is difficult to predict outcomes of home care interventions, say, compared to admission to care home or nursing home. Second, our ability to know exactly how an intervention will affect an intended outcome is also an unknown. While home care interventions and outcomes should continue to be examined, titration is a technique for the chemistry laboratory. (RH). |
Accession Number | CPA-050914209 A |
Classmark | NG: IGA: QA: QCG: WEA: 3LM: 7T |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|