Centre for Policy on Ageing
 

 

Friend or foe?
 — towards a critical assessment of direct payments
Author(s)Helen Spandler
Journal titleCritical Social Policy, vol 24, no 2, issue 79, May 2004
Pagespp 187-209
Sourcehttp://www.sagepublications.com
KeywordsServices ; Community care ; Social security benefits.
AnnotationDirect payments (DPs) enable individuals to purchase their own care rather than have directly provided services. This article unpicks the complexities involved in the implementation of DPs, by examining the need to reconcile the strong evidence of their benefits with emerging concerns about the wider consequences of their implementation. One practice that highlights the conflict at the heart of DPs is the employment of personal assistants, whose maximum benefit to recipients is at the expense of their rates of pay and conditions of employment that vary greatly between authorities. The author suggests a number of factors that need to be dealt with, in order to ensure that DPs continue to be a progressive strategy. These include: reconciling conflicting ideologies, such as advocating individual choice and/or collective provision; the need for political action to secure adequate resources; and the development of alternative strategies such as co-operatives to address the collective needs of DP recipients and workers. (RH).
Accession NumberCPA-040518206 A
ClassmarkI: PA: JH

Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing

...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing.
 

CPA home >> Ageinfo Database >> Last modified: Fri 21 Sep 2018, © CPA 2018 Queries to: webmaster@cpa.org.uk