|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
Oral versus written administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale | Author(s) | B J Cannon, T Thaler, S Roos |
Journal title | Aging & Mental Health, vol 6, no 4, November 2002 |
Pages | pp 418-422 |
Source | http://www.tandfonline.com |
Keywords | Depression ; Evaluation ; Methodology ; United States of America. |
Annotation | 44 American female nursing home residents completed the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) twice, using both oral and written administration, completion being counterbalanced. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale were administered to each participant between the GDS administrations. All testing was completed within one session. Test-retest reliability analysis revealed a significant correlation between oral and written administrations for higher cognitive functioning participants, but no correlation for impaired participants. Thus, the use of the GDS in a cognitively impaired population is questioned. Moreover, oral versus written administration formats were found to be not equivalent in the higher functioning group. (RH). |
Accession Number | CPA-021216239 A |
Classmark | ENR: 4C: 3D: 7T |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|