|
Centre for Policy on Ageing | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9363f/9363f578e2d59752b7ddb724e4162e6f3b760d4c" alt="" | |
|
Public-private interactions mandatory pensions in Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland | Author(s) | Martin Rein, John Turner |
Corporate Author | National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Japan |
Journal title | Review of Population and Social Policy, no 10, 2001 |
Pages | pp 107-154 |
Source | National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, Hibiya Kokusai Building 6th floor, 2-2-3 Uchisaiwai-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0011, Japan. www.ipss.go.jp |
Keywords | Pensions ; Private pensions ; Social policy ; Australia ; Netherlands ; Switzerland. |
Annotation | Mandating plays a role in the retirement income systems of nearly every country in the world. This article considers mandatory pensions as employer-provided occupational pensions, which appear to substitute for a portion, or all, of the earnings-related part of social security. Both Australia and Switzerland mandate private pension coverage, and the Netherlands has a partial mandating programme. While mandating with full compliance would raise 100% of the coverage of the population to which the mandate applies, in reality compliance is never complete: low-earning, part-time and part-year workers and the self-employed are typically excluded. This article examines the positions in Australia, the Netherlands and Switzerland, where there is evidence that poverty rates have declined since mandating was introduced. (RH). |
Accession Number | CPA-011211210 A |
Classmark | JJ: JK: TM2: 7YA: 76H: 76C |
Data © Centre for Policy on Ageing |
|
...from the Ageinfo database published by Centre for Policy on Ageing. |
| |
|